feat: 🔨 implement "IN" and "NOT IN" in text custom fields #128
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
thanks @szvarhegyi ! Cheers! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello everyone,
I am the developer of the SmartCohort plugin from CNW Co., a Moodle Partner. We have transitioned to Dynamic Cohort in our cloud service, and our goal is to assist you with our developments in the future.
One of our clients reported that they are unable to create a specific rule that was possible in SmartCohort. To enable this functionality, I have implemented the "IN" and "NOT IN" conditions. Currently, it simply separates the values with commas and applies the filtering accordingly.
Is there anything else we need to do to get this officially included?
You can add this condition:
Or this:
